Iron Mountain Fine-Tunes Cloud Storage for Medical Records

By: Chris Preimes­berger 2010-03-01

Iron Mountain’s Dig­i­tal Record Cen­ter for Med­ical Images is designed to back up and archive dig­i­tal med­ical infor­ma­tion, which often includes large, bulky X-ray files. Due to the sen­si­tiv­ity and impor­tance of med­ical data, another level of redun­dancy is built into the package.

As data stor­age gets more sophis­ti­cated, with intel­li­gent tier­ing, auto­matic dedu­pli­ca­tion and other emi­nently use­ful fea­tures, some ven­dors are begin­ning to fine-tune their stor­age prod­ucts for use in spe­cific ver­ti­cal mar­kets such as health care and finance.

For exam­ple, Iron Moun­tain on March 1 revealed a newly upgraded ver­sion of its cloud stor­age ser­vice specif­i­cally for med­ical records. The com­pany made the announce­ment at the HIMSS Health­care IT Con­fer­ence and Exhi­bi­tion in Boston.

IM’s Dig­i­tal Record Cen­ter for Med­ical Images is designed to back up and archive dig­i­tal med­ical infor­ma­tion, which often includes large, bulky X-ray files.

Due to the impor­tant and sen­si­tive nature of med­ical data, another level of redun­dancy is built into the package.

IM claims that this spe­cial­ized ver­sion of its ser­vice pro­vides higher lev­els of flex­i­bil­ity, increased scal­a­bil­ity, and bet­ter access and secu­rity than its stan­dard cloud stor­age because it adds an optional on-site stor­age com­po­nent to work with the exist­ing cloud service.

The com­pany also said health care orga­ni­za­tions can con­fig­ure the ser­vice to meet access and dis­as­ter recov­ery requirements.

Dig­i­tal Record Cen­ter for Med­ical Images offers these new capa­bil­i­ties, as listed by Iron Mountain:

New Ser­vice Options—three ser­vice plans for meet­ing orga­ni­za­tions’ unique needs for pro­tec­tion and redun­dancy: Mir­rored Cloud, stor­ing two copies of each med­ical image off­site; Hybrid Cloud, stor­ing one copy onsite and one off­site; and Hybrid Cloud2, stor­ing a sin­gle copy onsite and two copies offsite.

Data Shut­tle Service—allows orga­ni­za­tions to move large vol­umes of data to Iron Mountain’s data cen­ter faster than they could over the Internet.

Optional Onsite Storage—In addi­tion to cloud stor­age, a copy of archived data can also be stored onsite, enabling local access to archives while pro­vid­ing a sec­ond copy for disaster-recovery purposes.

Dig­i­tal Record Cen­ter for Med­ical Images is avail­able now.

htttp://storage.biz-news.com/news/en_US/2010/03/02/0001/iron-mountain-fine-tunes-cloud-storage-for-medical-records

Read more … Tues­day 2nd March 2010 — 00:17

Com­pli­ments of File­Man Research

Read More

Bill Regarding Records in Self-Storage Passes Committee in Maine

03/01/2010

Maine Leg­isla­tive Doc­u­ment 1499, “An Act to Pro­tect Con­fi­den­tial Con­sumer Records in Self-Service Stor­age Facil­i­ties,” has been passed by the Busi­ness Research and Eco­nomic Devel­op­ment Com­mit­tee. The Maine Self Stor­age Asso­ci­a­tion (MeSSA) has worked with the state leg­is­la­ture to craft and amend this new bill per­tain­ing to the han­dling of third-party per­sonal records in self-storage.

After a recent review of the bill, the BRED Com­mit­tee asked MeSSA to work with the Bureau of Con­sumer Credit Pro­tec­tion to agree on appro­pri­ate lan­guage for the bill. At the ses­sion on Feb. 9, asso­ci­a­tion pres­i­dent Rhonda Hal­lett Pope answered many ques­tions regard­ing self-storage oper­a­tion and leases as well as the association’s stance on the bill. After some sen­a­tors expressed con­cern about the bill, amend­ments were made, after which it passed the com­mit­tee unan­i­mously. MeSSA expects the bill to pass the House and Sen­ate with­out fur­ther debate.

Among the amend­ments made to the bill is that it no longer requires self-storage oper­a­tors to ask cus­tomers if they are stor­ing records via their lease. In addi­tion, when a cus­tomer defaults and the oper­a­tor cuts the lock on the tenant’s unit, the oper­a­tor may inspect the con­tents to check for per­sonal infor­ma­tion with­out lia­bil­ity. If the oper­a­tor believes there to be per­sonal infor­ma­tion con­tained in the unit, he can destroy the infor­ma­tion with­out lia­bil­ity. The oper­a­tor can also ask buy­ers who find per­sonal infor­ma­tion within a unit they have pur­chased to return it to the operator.

http://www.insideselfstorage.com/hotnews/maine-self-storage-records-bill-committee.html

Com­pli­ments of File­Man Research

Read More